BAGHDAD — The U.S. Army has dismissed a soldier who threatened fellow troops and sent the Pentagon a violent rap song he wrote to protest his Iraq redeployment orders, officials said Saturday.
The dismissal for misconduct means Spc. Marc A. Hall will avoid criminal charges but lose all military benefits earned over at least four years of service, including an earlier tour in Iraq.
Army spokesman Lt. Col. Eric Bloom said Saturday that top brass decided to discharge Hall instead of taking him to trial in part because he admitted his guilt.
“He understood the threats he made to his fellow soldiers,” Bloom said. “With the loss of his benefits, the time he’s already done in jail and his reduction in rank, that’s justice served.”
Hall has been jailed since Dec. 11, two days before his brigade with the Army’s 3rd Infantry Division out of Ft. Stewart, Ga., was scheduled to leave for Iraq. He was charged with the military offense of communicating a threat after telling his battalion commander that he might shoot or otherwise attack a fellow U.S. soldier, according to Army lawyers.
He served in Iraq in 2007-08.
But it was a CD recording of a rap song that Hall wrote and sent to the Army’s personnel office in July 2009 that gained notoriety for the case.
At that point, Army lawyers said, Hall knew his unit was scheduled to deploy — just two months before he was to finish his four-year enlistment contract. An unpopular Army policy known as “stop loss” requires that soldiers who are assigned to a unit at the time it deploys will be kept in the ranks for as long as the duration of the yearlong tour.
On the recording, Hall denounced the Army for the policy and rapped about opening fire with his military-issue M-4 rifle.
“I got a (expletive) magazine with 30 rounds, on a three-round burst, ready to fire down,” Hall rapped. “Still against the wall, I grab my M-4, spray and watch all the bodies hit the floor. … I bet you never stop-loss nobody no more, in your next lifetime of course. No remorse.”
Hall’s civilian attorney, David Gespass, said that while some of Hall’s words may have seemed threatening to the Army, he’s convinced the soldier never intended to harm anyone.
“The song was a way for him to sort of vent,” Gespass said. “He was, I think, less and less happy about the idea even of having a weapon and using it.”
Critics have called the case a free speech issue, saying Hall should not be punished for venting his anger about being sent back to Iraq right before he was supposed to get out of the Army.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
