For all the recent letter writers who have written about Jeff Sax’s very poor decision in trying to tie John Lovick to assault allegations for political gain, I totally agree with you. But, I’d like to challenge you and everyone else about why that same standard is not being used in Preident Trump’s or Brett Kavanaugh’s (or anyone else’s) defense? Isn’t a person “presumed innocent until proven guilty?”
Why is it acceptable to repeat the same negative allegations about these men without any veracity or truth? Shouldn’t the dirt just stay on the floor and get swept aside?
Catherine Paxton
Arlington
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.