Burke: Dilemma in donations is in where to put your money

With a range of worthy causes — charitable and political — how should one weigh where the need is greatest?

By Tom Burke / Herald Columnist

I sorta missed giving on “Giving Tuesday” last week, despite The Herald editorial reminding me.

But I’m not missing all those appeals to “Please Give Now,” still appearing on TV or filling my inboxes; they’re everywhere. (For the record I “give” throughout the year, but understand how focusing on a single day, as Giving Tuesday does, can encourage people to pull out a checkbook, credit card or electronic payment product to donate to a worthy cause.)

But, gentle reader, here’s my dilemma: Which worthy cause, of all the causes there are, are the worthiest to give to?

And how much should I give?

And is the money I give well spent?

(For that last question, here are three excellent websites: www.propublica.org/article/how-to-evaluate-charity-before-you-donate for (duh) how to evaluate a charity and www.charitynavigator.org/ or www.charitywatch.org/ for places that do the evaluation for you.)

But back to my initial dilemma: who gets how much of my hard-earned dough; there’s so much real need out there.

Consider, the American Civil Liberties Union is defending our constitutional rights (they ask for just $19 a month but I think I get a T-shirt) and we’re gonna need them bad as MAGA rushes head-long into a dictatorship; St. Jude Hospital helps kids and families and was founded by beloved entertainer Danny Thomas (also asking for $19 monthly and I get another T-shirt); the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, asking for 63 cents a day ($19 a month) is a candidate for my largesse, because who can resist all those woe-begotten, sad-eyed dogs and kittycats on TV; and Habitat for Humanity seems a worthy cause; who doesn’t want to follow in Jimmy Carter’s footsteps?

Of course these aren’t the only causes asking for money via reasonably sophisticated marketing and advertising campaigns that range from gut-wrenching “flies-in-the-eyes” pictures of suffering kids and critters to endorsements from celebrities.

So there’s Doctors without Borders, Kids in Need of Desks, World Central Kitchens, Save the Children, OxFam America, World Vision, Cancer Care, the World Wildlife Federation, No Kid Hungry, the American Cancer Society, Covenant House, CARE, UNICEF, the Alzheimer’s Association, the USO, and the Make-A-Wish Foundation.

And locally consider Mary’s Place, the YMCA and YWCA, Union Gospel Mission, local pet shelters, Puget Soundkeeper, the United Way, public radio, and the Washington Trails Association.

The League of Women Voters needs funding; and, speaking of politics:

It’s an arena for yet more dilemma – first, how to split my donations between “charity” and “politics;” and then, how much to contribute to national campaigns (ala the Democratic National Committee); important, individual out-of-state races; and statewide/local candidates?

I mean, do I give to Sen. Jon Tester in Montana or Sen. Sherrod Brown in Ohio, (for control of the Senate); or to Democrats to win back the House (ie. Colorado’s 5th, the district of Rep. Lauren “Grope and Vape” Boebert) and how much to give to keep a Republican or MAGA governor out of Olympia?

Oh yeah, I also gotta decide how much I can help keep Trump out of the White House; and that’s how much the Biden campaign gets.

Ya know, back in the day, when I was in the advertising business making TV commercials and radio spots, we were fighting for “share-of-belly” (fast food) or share of wallet (banks and insurance).

But charitable and political giving is much more complex because charities only get their share of wallet after everyone else, because folks need car, homeowners and life insurance, their mortgage or rent payment; plus doctor bills, clothes and medicine, and food on the table, and a lot more.

So while consumer marketers simply have to convince the buyer they’re better than their competitors (Big Mac or Whopper? Geico’s gekko or Liberty’s emu?); charities have to both convince the target to forgo discretionary spending choices so they can afford to give (not buy the latest video game?) and then do battle to secure the donation for themselves.

For me, the choice of who to give to and how much to give is both daunting and uplifting.

I am daunted because there is so, so much need in the world today; and uplifted because I can do a little something to help ameliorate that need.

I am overwhelmed I have to put so much money into politics — not to support who has the better idea for national health care or an immigration policy (like in the “old” days) — but to defend the very idea of democracy from authoritarian-dictator-wanna-be candidates who want to overturn the Constitution, or impose a right-wing Christian theocracy, or just to steal as much as they can; and I’m uplifted when I see the anti-MAGA forces I support win.

I know prudent personal fiscal policy should have me sitting down doing a year-long budget and allocating X dollars to charity and Y dollars to politics. Or maybe just biblically tithing.

But I doubt I’ll do that.

Instead, I’ll watch the commercials and read the ads then succumb to the best heartstrings-tugging pitch or dire warning of impending doom, write a check, and then figure out how to pay for it.

So I currently support KNKX radio (jazz and public radio), Biden, Tester, the Y, and World Central Kitchens; and I’ll wait ‘till next year for the big political stuff. Now wadda ya say we give Mark Twain the last charitable word here: “Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see.”

Which means I probably need to add the Hearing Health Foundation or Seattle DeafBlind Service Center to my list of who to consider.

Damn. Where’s a MEGA-Millions win when so many need so much?

Slava Ukraini.

Tom Burke’s email address is t.burke.column@gmail.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, March 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Washington State Patrol Chief John Batiste, center, greets a new trooper during a graduation ceremony, as Gov. Jay Inslee looks on in the Rotunda at the Capitol Thursday, Dec. 13, 2018, in Olympia, Wash. The class of 31 troopers completed more than 1,000 hours of training and will now work for the WSP across the state. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
Editorial: Lawmakers miss good shot for fewer traffic deaths

Legislation to lower the blood alcohol limit for drivers didn’t get floor debate and vote in Senate.

Eco-nomics: Preparing for, limiting climate crisis demands a plan

Fortunately, local governments are developing and updating climate action plans to outline necessary steps.

Comment: State ‘mansion tax’ would bite at all income levels

More than high-priced homes, it would increase costs for employers and multi-family housing projects.

Forum: Separation of church and state keeps us from unholy wars

Civilizations have tried the route of state religion, only to see the rise of religious persecution.

Sid Roberts, mayor of Stanwood
Forum: Reliance on social media leads to antisocial outcomes

The interaction via phones and screens is easily abused and limits the context of a face-to-face talk.

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Two works in progress to save Columbia Basin salmon

Sculptures of an Indian fishing rights activist will guard commitments to save salmon and honor treaties.

February 27, 2024: Alabama Embryo Ruling
Editorial cartoons for Friday, March 1

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Schwab: Kids’ are all right, if a tad cold; nation’s another matter

Alabama’s IVF ruling shows the dangers in the creep of theocracy into our courts and other institutions.

Choose sources of news carefully to understand world

From what I have seen and heard, there are still many people… Continue reading

GOP wants to run on border crisis, not fix it

Regarding a recent letter to the editor about Herald Columnist Sid Schwab,… Continue reading

FILE - In this Aug. 21, 2015 file photo, a tanker airplane drops fire retardant on a wildfire burning near Twisp, Wash. Three firefighters were killed battling the blaze. The story was a top Washington state news item in 2015. Public Lands Commissioner Hilary Franz has proposed a plan to strengthen the ways that Washington can prevent and respond to wildfires. Franz released the 10-year plan last week as part of her $55 million budget request to the Legislature to improve the state's firefighting abilities (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: Wildfire threat calls for restoring full funding

Lawmakers should restore funding for fighting wildfires and call on one furry firefighter in particular.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.