Comment: Debt ceiling deal is there, but it’s all up to McCarthy

The House speaker must line up enough votes in his fractious caucus; that may not be possible.

By Jonathan Bernstein / Bloomberg Opinion

The odd thing about the debt limit negotiations is that it isn’t hard to imagine a compromise on the big issues separating the two parties.

As part of a deal to raise the borrowing limit, Democrats could offer to accept some Republican cuts in federal spending, coupled with a few other GOP priorities such as changes to the permitting process for energy projects and a deal to rescind unspent covid relief funds. Republicans wouldn’t get all they want; spending would be trimmed, not slashed, and the big Democratic legislative achievement passed last year, the health-and-climate measure officially known as the Inflation Reduction Act, wouldn’t be repealed.

If the contours of a deal are obvious to most of us, why can’t the two sides get there?

The primary problem remains the pernicious politics of the House GOP caucus. Some 50 or so of the most extreme House Republicans are almost certain to oppose any deal that President Joe Biden would sign on to. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy barely managed to keep them on board for the partisan messaging bill passed last week that gave far-right members a lot of things they wanted (most of which would never be tolerated by Democrats). And since many mainstream conservatives in the House are reluctant to allow any room between themselves and the extremists, it will be hard to get as many as half the party on board with a compromise, so any deal will fall short in the House.

Then there are McCarthy’s own troubles. Even if he is able to deliver the votes on a debt ceiling compromise, House Republicans who oppose any agreement could launch an attempt to dump him as speaker. If that happens, it would only take a handful of Republicans to prevent McCarthy from securing the House majority that he needs to hold on to his job, unless Democrats supply votes to save him. With that threat looming, it’s no wonder McCarthy would be reluctant to make a deal with Democrats.

If it was just a question of reaching a bipartisan agreement, Senate Republicans and Democrats could probably get it done, and we would be looking to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell for positive signals. But McConnell isn’t going to broker a deal that the House might defeat; or that McCarthy might not even bring to a vote.

Another hurdle to a debt ceiling deal is that President Biden quite reasonably has insisted that the borrowing cap be dealt with separately from policy and budget negotiations. Democrats have had every right to object to House Republicans holding the U.S. economy hostage in order to extract policy concessions. But as the window for resolving the crisis narrows, Biden has signaled that he would accept a “separate paths” approach, in which policy negotiations proceed and everyone — or at least the Democrats — pretend that the debt limit increase was passed at the same time as a policy deal, yet wasn’t linked to it. The good news is that the two sides met on Tuesday; their staffs are continuing to talk; and the principals have agreed to meet again today.

Meanwhile, both Biden and McCarthy are trying to spin the narrative to their advantage, accusing the other side of being unreasonable. We don’t know where their real bottom lines are.

The one thing that could solve McCarthy’s immediate problems would be if Biden were to take unilateral action on the debt ceiling by invoking the 14th Amendment or one of the other unorthodox solutions being discussed in policy circles. Doing so would spare McCarthy the need to negotiate with the White House over anything until fall, when Congress needs to work out annual spending bills.

The U.S. is perhaps three weeks away from defaulting on its debt, a once-unfathomable event that would cause economic calamity. McCarthy said after his meeting with Biden that the House wouldn’t consider adopting a short-term debt limit extension to forestall imminent disaster. But that could just be bluster. An agreement, while still improbable, can’t be ruled out.

It’s likely Biden will take unilateral action if that’s the only way to prevent a default. But it’s hard to know for sure. Biden’s lawyers might have convinced him that unilateral action isn’t legally feasible. Or his economists might have convinced him that the markets would view such a maneuver as damaging as an actual default. In which case, our only hope is that the speaker and other House Republicans are willing to accept a little political risk in order to accept a deal, instead of shorting out the economy to buy a little job comfort.

Jonathan Bernstein is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering politics and policy. A former professor of political science at the University of Texas at San Antonio and DePauw University, he wrote A Plain Blog About Politics.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Attorney General Bob Ferguson speaks to a reporter as his 2024 gubernatorial campaign launch event gets underway in Seattle, on Saturday, Sept. 9, 2023. ( Jerry Cornfield/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Recruiting two Bob Fergusons isn’t election integrity

A GOP activist paid the filing fee for two gubernatorial candidates who share the attorney general’s name.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Foster parent abstract concept vector illustration. Foster care, father in adoption, happy interracial family, having fun, together at home, childless couple, adopted child abstract metaphor.
Editorial: State must return foster youths’ federal benefits

States, including Washington, have used those benefits, rather than hold them until adulthood.

Comment: Turning 65? Here’s what to know about Medicare

You have options, but you’ll need to ask yourself some questions before picking a plan that fits your needs.

James Bouie: Presidents judged on handling crisis; except Trump

Many give Trump a pass over his leadership during the covid pandemic. Do we risk another crisis?

David Brooks: Voters want change, but what kind of change?

Trump’s lead in swing states points to voters’ angry nostalgia to return things to their liking.

Ross Douthat: Moralism has its limits in Middle East and U.S.

Noting about this can be reduced to a single moral argument. But, then, that’s always been the case.

Nicholas Kristof: If only Biden had used leverage sooner

The president is right to delay bomb shipments to Israel. Used earlier it could have saved children.

Making adjustments to keep Social Security solvent represents only one of the issues confronting Congress. It could also correct outdated aspects of a program that serves nearly 90 percent of Americans over 65. (Stephen Savage/The New York Times) -- NO SALES; FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY WITH NYT STORY SLUGGED SCI SOCIAL SECURITY BY PAULA SPAN FOR NOV. 26, 2018. ALL OTHER USE PROHIBITED.
Editorial: Social Security’s good news? Bad news delayed a bit

Congress has a little additional time to make sure Social Security is solvent. It shouldn’t waste it.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks to reporters during a press conference about the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Wednesday, May 1, 2024. Senate Democrats reintroduced broad legislation on Wednesday to legalize cannabis on the federal level, a major shift in policy that has wide public support, but which is unlikely to be enacted this year ahead of November’s elections and in a divided government. (Valerie Plesch/The New York Times)
Editorial: Federal moves on cannabis encouraging, if incomplete

The Biden administration and the Senate offer sensible proposals to better address marijuana use.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Maureen Dowd: Stormy Daniels was Trump’s bad character witness

Making no apologies, the porn star testified to Trump’s immoral values, reminding voters who Trump is.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.