Comment: How do grandparents stay ‘socially distant’ from kids?

As the song says, there are choices to make based on ‘what condition our condition is in.’

By Barry Golson / Special to The Washington Post

I am in our living room, looking fearfully at my lively, affectionate 4-year-old granddaughter.

“Hey Pops, can you twirl me?” She is moving toward me, hands outstretched, a threat to my very life.

If she makes her next usual move, which is to wrap her arms around my neck, and I twirl her around, it is possible that she could transmit the virus from her sweet mouth to my droopy eyes or shaggy nostrils.

Who knows where she’s been? Did she grasp the monkey bars at the playground? Were they recently held by the sweaty palms of some other unwitting kindergartner whose uncle had a stopover in Wuhan, or perhaps Milan, and then Kirkland, Washington, thus completing a terrible chain to deliver a fatal dose of coronavirus to this dozy retiree in Tampa, Florida?

I move back, put up my hands defensively.

“Not now, sweetie.”

“Aww. Is it your back, again, Pops? I can jump up to you.”

“No, it’s not my back.” Always implying, this one. “My back is fine, strong as always. It’s like your mommy told you. We just shouldn’t get too huggy. There are germs around now.”

And there are. Nobody knows how quickly these viral fleas jump from host to host, but from what I read, by the time I finish writing this, it is expected that several new nations will be in lockdown. My wife and I moved here to be “close to the kids,” the legal term that describes this phase of our generation’s migrant golden years. Being a part of their lives is pretty much what we have going for us now. And now we have to figure out how to extricate ourselves, at least for the time being. Which time could be … a long time.

So here we are in the spring of 2020, amid a pandemic out of a Stephen King novel that targets the elderly and the infirm, but mysteriously spares the young; who may be silent carriers.

Those of us past our 65 die-by dates are now supposed to decide how much or how little we should quarantine ourselves from our kids’ lives. We oldies are supposed to quarantine ourselves, to sequester from children or the sick, to FaceTime each other, to stay away from families — and pretty much anyone else — until the tsunami recedes. Which could be, I don’t know, three months, six months, a year, longer.

But it’s not because we want to avoid exposing our innocent infants to grown-up poxes but because the little critters could kill us. We’re the prey in this streaming movie. The darling kids are the ones standing in a row, eyes glittering in the fields, children of the corona.

The subtleties of navigating possible self-quarantine depend as well on our conditions. If, in addition to being just old, we also have underlying problems, such as lowered immune systems, or certain cancers, or respiratory ailments, or hypertension — the list goes on and on — we are supposed to be more susceptible to the virus, and should wall ourselves off accordingly.

So we rely on our old standby, checking the condition of our conditions, asking which couples, parents, and extended family, are most susceptible? Is my autoimmune disease more susceptible than my wife’s hypertension? If so, do I have to stay alone at Easter while she bends the rules to hide the colored eggs? (Of course, she’ll vigorously wash her hands afterward.)

My wife and I have only a few years left before we become as hopelessly out of it as, say, elderly presidential candidates tend to be. Our granddaughters, ages 6 and 4, have only a few years left before they start to find us hopeless, before the eye-rolling begins.

How brief a time do we have? What a small crack of light, while they think you are interesting, care what you think, laugh at your granddad jokes. And, it has to be said, how impossibly, ridiculously adorable they are just now, with their ballet moves, and their stick-figure sketches, their lisps, their princess gowns, their one-act plays, their tumbles off the end of the sofa, and their upside-down sunglasses.

We’re supposed to give all that up, stay away, cue Netflix and chill down to safe, antiseptic isolation? To save our lives?

Nah.

“OK, grab my neck, I’ll lift you. Let’s twirl.”

Barry Golson is a veteran journalist and former editor at Playboy, TV Guide and Yahoo! Internet Life. He has contributed to the New York Times, Los Angeles, Salon and others.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, June 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

AP government students at Henry M. Jackson High School visited the state Capitol this spring and watched as a resolution they helped draft was adopted in the Senate as part of the Building Bridges Future Leaders Academy. (Josh Estes / Building Bridges)
Comment: Future leaders learn engineering of building bridges

Here’s what Jackson High government students learned with the help of local officials and lawmakers.

Comment: Early cancer diagnosis can be key in saving lives

An act in Congress would allow Medicare coverage for early-detection tests for a range of cancers.

Comment: In wildfire crisis, options for forests, communities

By thinning threatened forests, mass timber can use that material for homes, businesses and more.

Forum: Everett’s land-use plan should keep affordable housing tool

Its comprehensive plan should keep inclusionary zoning, setting aside housing for working families.

Forum: Advice to young adults, focus on your best ‘person’

Past generations focused on the character aspects of gender roles, but something more basic is necessary.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, June 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

In a gathering similar to many others across the nation on Presidents Day, hundreds lined Broadway with their signs and chants to protest the Trump administration Monday evening in Everett. (Aaron Kennedy / Daily Herald)
Editorial: Let’s remember the ‘peaceably’ part of First Amendment

Most of us understand the responsibilities of free speech; here’s how we remind President Trump.

The Buzz: ‘Your majesty, the peasants are revolting!’

Well, that’s a little harsh, but we’re sure the ‘No Kings’ protesters clean up well after their marches.

Schwab: Why keep up nonviolent protests? Because they work

Our greatest democratic victories came on the heels of massive, nationwide demonstrations.

Bouie: Trump’s weaknesses show through theater of strength

His inability to calmly confront opposition and respond with force betrays brittleness and insecurity.

Add your voice to protect freedoms at No Kings Day protests

Imagine it’s 2045. Nationwide, women have been fully stripped of rights to… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.