Comment: There’s now a brief window to pass covid relief

Prior to a Biden inauguration, McConnell and Pelosi can adopt a modest short-term relief package.

By Karl W. Smith / Bloomberg Opinion

If current projections hold, Joe Biden will win the White House while Republicans will retain control of the Senate. For anyone hoping for more economic stimulus, this may seem the worst possible outcome: Legislative gridlock is far more likely than new legislation.

Yet all hope is not lost. Passage of a covid relief bill remains possible, both before the end of the year and after the inauguration in January. If House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to get a Biden administration started on solid footing, she will try to cut a deal with the most powerful Republican in Washington — that remains Senate Leader Mitch McConnell — before Biden is sworn in.

It’s useful to recall just how stuck negotiations were before the election. Last month Pelosi and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin were engaged in drawn-out talks over a covid relief bill. There was little possibility that anything nearly as large as the two of them were discussing — about $2 trillion — was going to pass the Senate. Even before the election, many Senate Republicans had begun to rediscover their concern about the national debt.

Pelosi and other Democrats assumed, not incorrectly, that the prospects for any deal would be far better if they controlled the Senate and White House. With that no longer a possibility, Pelosi has an incentive to take what she can get now.

Holding out for a better deal doesn’t come with the guarantee of a bigger package later, but it does risk damaging the economy in the meantime, making it harder for Democrats to govern once Biden is sworn in.

It would be a delicate negotiation. Any package that passed now would be much smaller than the one the Trump administration agreed to before the election. And Pelosi would have to use all her political skill to explain that she was not making a concession just as her party was about to take over the executive branch. Her best argument is that even a small stimulus could be enough to stabilize the economy over the next several months.

What is Republicans’ incentive? McConnell himself has said that a stimulus bill is a priority when the Senate returns next week. And despite their general reluctance to spend, they do support some additional funding for schools, health care and loans to small businesses. They could also attempt to extract liability protections — a longstanding goal of McConnell — in exchange for some support for state and local governments that Democrats are desperate to pass.

After Biden is sworn in, the difficulty level greatly increases. With Trump gone, the Republican Senate would probably dig in and demand a return to austerity. The situation would call for the type of negotiation Biden excels at, and he would look to offer Republicans something they want more than a return to fiscal discipline. The obvious trade would be to make Trump’s tax cuts permanent.

Again, that would open Biden to the charge of surrendering to Republicans just after winning a mandate to overturn their policies. But taking some criticism would be preferable to enduring the pain of a slow recovery.

Neither of these scenarios, admittedly, is appealing for Democrats, who will undoubtedly want to flex some muscle after taking the White House. But their main concern should be giving the economy the boost it needs now and next year. For both the country and a Biden presidency, failure to act would be devastating.

Karl W. Smith is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He was formerly vice president for federal policy at the Tax Foundation and assistant professor of economics at the University of North Carolina. He is also co-founder of the economics blog Modeled Behavior.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Getty Images
Editorial: Lawmakers should outline fairness of millionaires tax

How the revenue will be used, in part to make state taxes less regressive, is key to its acceptance.

Comment: Federal bankers deserve an F on climate threat

In dismissing the financial threat from the climate crisis, Fed bankers set the nation up for failure.

Comment: The federal agency brain drain will have dire effects

More than 10,000 workers with STEM doctorates are gone. Who will solve crises and innovate for America?

Ask lawmakers to reject bill to bar removal from tent encampments

Proposed Washington House Bill 2489, per media, is “the Shelters Not Penalties… Continue reading

Heritage Foundation to blame for Trump’s return

Do you recall the day when you lost faith in our democratic… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump’s election manuevers about more than ego-boosting

The president likely has designs on manipulating the midterms by casting doubt on results.

A horse near transmission lines in Houston, Sept. 20, 2023. Texas has grown to be the second-largest solar power producer in the country. (Annie Mulligan / The New York Times)
Comment: Two energy roads, different futures for world’s climate

The paths for fossil fuels and renewables are set, with countries choosing diverging road maps.

The Buzz: In celebration of bunnies, from Bugs to Bad

We can’t help but see some characteristics shared between Elmer Fudd and Donald Trump.

Comment: Revolutionary War fought by ordinary men and women

Early battles, such as at Moore’s Creek Bridge, and won by volunteer loyalists inspired others to join the fight.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.