Editorial: Local issues should be driving voter turnout

The irony is that off-year elections, where the races are local, often have the greatest impact.

By The Herald Editorial Board

It’s required of editorial writers to provide at least one editorial each year reminding voters to go to the polls or — in the case of Washington state voters — mark their mail-in ballots and get them in. (It’s a contract obligation, right after the list of words and phrases to avoid, such as “ilk,” “beat a dead horse” and “seriously consider.”)

So, please, get out your ballot, make your choices and send it in.

So far, turnout is not looking impressive, as The Herald’s Jerry Cornfield reported Thursday. As of the morning of Oct. 31, only 9 percent of the 456,000 ballots mailed to Snohomish County voters nearly two weeks before had been returned. That’s a rate of return that county Auditor Carolyn Weikel called kind of “baffling.” That’s from an election official who is accustomed to voters taking their time with their ballots.

Even some high-profile races and measures, particularly in Everett, Mukilteo and Snohomish, weren’t moving the needle — oops, sorry; “moving the needle” is on that list, too — were not prompting voters to get their ballots in early. Only 10 percent of Everett voters, nearly 15 percent of Mukilteo voters and 13 percent of Snohomish voters, had returned their ballots before the end of the month.

There’s nothing wrong with waiting until Election Day, Nov. 7 this year, to cast ballots, but the lagging turnout can indicate a lack of enthusiasm during a particular election year. And that, when you consider what’s at stake this year, is baffling.

Everett, along with three council races, is choosing a mayor following the longest tenure — 14 years — of an Everett mayor in history, and almost certainly for the first time is electing a woman to the post. Two races in Mukilteo — one for mayor and one council seat — are contentious, to put it charitably. And that’s no less the case in Snohomish, which has five city council races among its seven council seats and is choosing a mayor to run its new “strong mayor” form of government. Oh, and Snohomish voters also are advising the city on whether they want to see cannabis sold in retail shops within the city limits.

Additionally, three-fifths of the Snohomish County Council is up for election.

And nearly every community in the county is being asked to elect or re-elect representatives for mayor, city council, school board, fire or other districts, along with accepting or rejecting local tax measures.

Turnout in presidential election years and even in years when congressional and legislative races are in play is generally higher. Snohomish County turnout last November was nearly 79 percent and 80 percent in 2012. But turnout in odd-numbered years, when local races predominate, has been far lower and trending downward: 52 percent in 2011, 42 percent in 2013 and 35 percent in 2015.

Every election is different, offering candidates and measures that can influence turnout. For example, the state’s voters this year are not considering any initiatives or referendums that typically can increase interest in voting.

The irony is that off-year elections, where the races are local, often have the greatest impact on communities and residents, determining the local officials who will be making decisions regarding public safety, transportation, zoning, businesses, schools, fire protection, local taxes and more.

We’re reminded often that elections have consequences.

But there are also consequences in not voting.

Ballots due Nov. 7

A listing of the editorial board’s endorsements prior to the primary and general election will appear on the Sunday Herald Opinion page, but is already available online at www.HeraldNet.com/tag/editorials/ as are the full editorials for many races in the county.

Once you have your ballot filled out, you can mail it — and don’t forget the stamp — or take it to one of several ballot drop boxes in the county. A full list of ballot drop box location can be found online at tinyurl.com/SnoCoVoteDropBoxes.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 8

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks to reporters during a press conference about the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Wednesday, May 1, 2024. Senate Democrats reintroduced broad legislation on Wednesday to legalize cannabis on the federal level, a major shift in policy that has wide public support, but which is unlikely to be enacted this year ahead of November’s elections and in a divided government. (Valerie Plesch/The New York Times)
Editorial: Federal moves on cannabis encouraging, if incomplete

The Biden administration and the Senate offer sensible proposals to better address marijuana use.

Tom Burke: Don’t know much about history? Better start reading

Reading — anything — matters, but especially before an election with history-making consequences.

Where did Carolyn Hax advice column go?

Recently the Herald has replaced the Carolyn Hax column with Dear Abby.… Continue reading

Why did The Herald add an astrology column in print?

We live in times when accurate information and good science are vital.… Continue reading

Plastics are vital to health care

Regarding a recent letter warning about plastic pollution: For the past six… Continue reading

Climate change, nuclear war threat to life on earth

There is one sentinel topic that has received minimal media attention in… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A radiation warning sign along the road near the Hanford Site in Washington state, on Aug. 10, 2022. Hanford, the largest and most contaminated of all American nuclear weapons production sites, is too polluted to ever be returned to public use. Cleanup efforts are now at an inflection point.  (Mason Trinca/The New York Times)
Editorial: Latest Hanford cleanup plan must be scrutinized

A new plan for treating radioactive wastes offers a quicker path, but some groups have questions.

Maureen Dowd: Consider the three faces of Donald Trump

Past, present and future are visibile in his countenance; an especially grim one on the cover of Time.

Paul Krugman: Still no stag and not much flation

The grumbling about inflation’s slow path to 2 percent isn’t worth steps that risk a recession.

David Brooks: Why past is prologue and protests help Trump

Today’s crowd-sourced protests muddle their message and goals and alienate the quiet disapprovers.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.