Forum: An ode to the telephone wire and the loss of reliability

If the landline phone was limited to one job, it was cheap and lasted for decades. Not so our ‘smart’ phones.

Ron Friesen

Ron Friesen

By Ron Friesen / Herald Columnist

“Liar, liar, pants on fire, hanging from a telephone wire.”

“Grandpa, what’s a telephone wire?”

Indeed, good question. Before we had smart phones, that handheld computer connecting us to individuals, phones were actually connected using wire. Whoever was at the phone’s location would answer when the phone rang. It was a good system, but not perfect.

Despite its flaws, there was one advantage we have lost and have not recovered. The old system was an enduring, robust, stand-alone system. Today’s systems are not like this at all. They are more fragile than a bubble in the air.

You could keep an old telephone for 30 years, and it would still work just fine. And when a replacement was required, the cost was reasonable.

The wired system would work in an emergency, even if the power went out because it was not dependent on the local power system. Today’s communication systems, which are touted as do-everything-for-everyone-all-at-once are amazingly fragile, short lived, expensive and troublesome.

I realize the same things were said about cars when they were replacing horses. And back then, they were right. Plus, buggy whip makers were losing money!

But there is a big difference. The emphasis on cars in their early days was to first make them more robust and reliable, not constantly more complex.

In today’s high-tech world, the exact opposite is happening. The constant emphasis is on greater complexity, which requires constant upgrades. In five years, my smart phone will be in the landfill. Why? Because it is no longer complex enough to do all the latest and greatest things and run all the gizmos. The phone in my hand right now exceeds what was needed to put our first man on the moon. But shortly, obsolete.

The computers on wheels we are buying at outlandish prices will be obsolete in five years too. Not because of mechanical failure. But because of technology failure. Today’s cars can do everything except put on your clothes and brush your teeth. But when a critical electronic control module fails, even if it is not directly tied to vehicle operation, you are stuck. Good luck getting an a module for a car more than 10 years old.

I am a big fan of everything technology can do for us, even if it sounds like I am not. But we need technology that is robust, reliable, and intuitive. Today’s technologies are none of these. It still feels like we are stuck building Model T Fords and piling on extras.

There is no way to achieve 100 percent reliability in anything. But what is missing today in technology is an old-fashioned concept called rigor. This is the “we want to be positive it works right before we toss it out there for everyone to use.” Today’s technology for the average consumer is not like that at all.

Beta versions of software are barely tested. Then off we go! Versions 1-point-o, 2-point-o, 3-point-o, etc. all with “bug fixes” and “security patches” which were not spotted in the hasty development and roll-out. Meanwhile, the messaging is always, “Look how much better it is!”

But the never addressed and always unanswered question is this: “Will it last longer and be more reliable?” And why is this? The answer is simple: money.

The people who make the most money are the ones who can tantalize us with the latest, greatest shiny object. This is not new. But now with a “smart phone” in our clutches every moment, advertisers do not have to wait for us to watch TV, listen to a radio, or read a newspaper. We are their captive audience, 24/7.

To break this cycle of debilitating dependency on unreliable technologies placed upon us by greedy techno-giants, we need to lift up our eyes.

Ron Friesen is a longtime Marysville resident, a retired music teacher and community and church musician and is committed to community improvement.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

FILE - In this Aug. 28, 1963 file photo, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., head of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, speaks to thousands during his "I Have a Dream" speech in front of the Lincoln Memorial for the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, in Washington. A new documentary “MLK/FBI,” shows how FBI director J. Edgar Hoover used the full force of his federal law enforcement agency to attack King and his progressive, nonviolent cause. That included wiretaps, blackmail and informers, trying to find dirt on King. (AP Photo/File)
Editorial: King would want our pledge to nonviolent action

His ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail’ outlines his oath to nonviolence and disruptive resistance.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Jan. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: State cut to Medicaid’s dental care a threat to health

Reduced reimbursements could make it harder for many to get preventive and other needed care.

Comment: Take action against counterfeit weight-loss drugs

Authorization for GLP-1 drugs made by compounding pharmacies has ended. Their risks are alarming.

Comment: There’s a better way to transfer job-skills licenses

State compacts for occupational licenses are cumbersome. Universal recognition streamlines the process.

Forum: Continuing Dr. King’s work requires a year-round commitment

We can march and honor his legacy this weekend, but we should strive for his dream every day.

Forum: We’ll never get to ‘Great Again’ without a humble spirit

What we should demand of our leaders — and ourselves — is humility, accountability and disciplined speech.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Jan. 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A Microsoft data center campus in East Wenatchee on Nov. 3. The rural region is changing fast as electricians from around the country plug the tech industry’s new, giant data centers into its ample power supply. (Jovelle Tamayo / The New York Times)
Editorial: Meeting needs for data centers, fair power rates

Shared energy demand for AI and ratepayers requires an increased pace for clean energy projects.

The Buzz: Have we thanked Trump even once for all he’s done?

Mr. President, please accept this gold-toned plastic ‘Best Stepdad Ever’ trophy as a token of our thanks.

Schwab: Or: How I learned to stop worrying and love the Don

As I have always said, the facts side with Trump and his team; on the ICE fatal shooting and more.

Kristof: ‘We’re No. 1”? How does 32nd of 171 countries sound?

Regardless of presidential administration, the nation’s standing on several measures has dropped over the years.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.