Forum: An ode to the telephone wire and the loss of reliability

If the landline phone was limited to one job, it was cheap and lasted for decades. Not so our ‘smart’ phones.

Ron Friesen

Ron Friesen

By Ron Friesen / Herald Columnist

“Liar, liar, pants on fire, hanging from a telephone wire.”

“Grandpa, what’s a telephone wire?”

Indeed, good question. Before we had smart phones, that handheld computer connecting us to individuals, phones were actually connected using wire. Whoever was at the phone’s location would answer when the phone rang. It was a good system, but not perfect.

Despite its flaws, there was one advantage we have lost and have not recovered. The old system was an enduring, robust, stand-alone system. Today’s systems are not like this at all. They are more fragile than a bubble in the air.

You could keep an old telephone for 30 years, and it would still work just fine. And when a replacement was required, the cost was reasonable.

The wired system would work in an emergency, even if the power went out because it was not dependent on the local power system. Today’s communication systems, which are touted as do-everything-for-everyone-all-at-once are amazingly fragile, short lived, expensive and troublesome.

I realize the same things were said about cars when they were replacing horses. And back then, they were right. Plus, buggy whip makers were losing money!

But there is a big difference. The emphasis on cars in their early days was to first make them more robust and reliable, not constantly more complex.

In today’s high-tech world, the exact opposite is happening. The constant emphasis is on greater complexity, which requires constant upgrades. In five years, my smart phone will be in the landfill. Why? Because it is no longer complex enough to do all the latest and greatest things and run all the gizmos. The phone in my hand right now exceeds what was needed to put our first man on the moon. But shortly, obsolete.

The computers on wheels we are buying at outlandish prices will be obsolete in five years too. Not because of mechanical failure. But because of technology failure. Today’s cars can do everything except put on your clothes and brush your teeth. But when a critical electronic control module fails, even if it is not directly tied to vehicle operation, you are stuck. Good luck getting an a module for a car more than 10 years old.

I am a big fan of everything technology can do for us, even if it sounds like I am not. But we need technology that is robust, reliable, and intuitive. Today’s technologies are none of these. It still feels like we are stuck building Model T Fords and piling on extras.

There is no way to achieve 100 percent reliability in anything. But what is missing today in technology is an old-fashioned concept called rigor. This is the “we want to be positive it works right before we toss it out there for everyone to use.” Today’s technology for the average consumer is not like that at all.

Beta versions of software are barely tested. Then off we go! Versions 1-point-o, 2-point-o, 3-point-o, etc. all with “bug fixes” and “security patches” which were not spotted in the hasty development and roll-out. Meanwhile, the messaging is always, “Look how much better it is!”

But the never addressed and always unanswered question is this: “Will it last longer and be more reliable?” And why is this? The answer is simple: money.

The people who make the most money are the ones who can tantalize us with the latest, greatest shiny object. This is not new. But now with a “smart phone” in our clutches every moment, advertisers do not have to wait for us to watch TV, listen to a radio, or read a newspaper. We are their captive audience, 24/7.

To break this cycle of debilitating dependency on unreliable technologies placed upon us by greedy techno-giants, we need to lift up our eyes.

Ron Friesen is a longtime Marysville resident, a retired music teacher and community and church musician and is committed to community improvement.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Friday, June 27, 2025. The sweeping measure Senate Republican leaders hope to push through has many unpopular elements that they despise. But they face a political reckoning on taxes and the scorn of the president if they fail to pass it. (Kent Nishimura/The New York Times)
Editorial: GOP should heed all-caps message on tax policy bill

Trading cuts to Medicaid and more for tax cuts for the wealthy may have consequences for Republicans.

Burke: Assessing dangers to democracy, knowing how to respond

In judging a threat consider Trump’s intent and his ability to carry out his intentions.

Oppose passage of ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ in Congress

The so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” threatens half of America’s children. (“Medicaid cuts… Continue reading

Stand up to oppose cuts to Medicaid and more

I am a senior citizen, having believed for the years of my… Continue reading

Skip the private fireworks displays, please

As everyone knows, our great country’s birthday, The Fourth of July, is… Continue reading

Comment: ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ will be hard sell to public

Republicans now must explain its cuts to health coverage, SNAP and clean energy credits and additional debt.

Alaina Livingston, a 4th grade teacher at Silver Furs Elementary, receives her Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine at a vaccination clinic for Everett School District teachers and staff at Evergreen Middle School on Saturday, March 6, 2021 in Everett, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: RFK Jr., CDC panel pose threat to vaccine access

Pharmacies following newly changed CDC guidelines may restrict access to vaccines for some patients.

Making adjustments to keep Social Security solvent represents only one of the issues confronting Congress. It could also correct outdated aspects of a program that serves nearly 90 percent of Americans over 65. (Stephen Savage/The New York Times) -- NO SALES; FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY WITH NYT STORY SLUGGED SCI SOCIAL SECURITY BY PAULA SPAN FOR NOV. 26, 2018. ALL OTHER USE PROHIBITED.
Editorial: Congress must act on Social Security’s solvency

That some workers are weighing early retirement and reduced benefits should bother members of Congress.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, July 1

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Dowd: Trump obliterates any sense of reliance on facts, truth

Any attempt to set the record straight is met with charges of having a lack of respect and patriotism.

Saunders: Price to pay for GOP senators who defy the president

Trump wants his Bill Beautiful Bill passed; and soon. Republicans’ future may hinge on it.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.