Forum: County’s wetland mitigation project hides other losses

The Little Bear Creek project is a fig leaf that allows wetland destruction elsewhere in the county.

By William Lider / Herald Forum

Snohomish County’s award for the Little Bear Creek advanced mitigation site reported in The Herald article only tells part of the story (“County wins award for Little Bear Creek wetland restoration,” The Herald, July 30). The county seeks to hide the true, insidious nature of this project.

So how could anyone be opposed to creating new wetlands? When these wetlands are created as faux mitigation for development projects that will harm streams and wetlands miles away from the Little Bear Creek site with zero, nada, zilch mitigation benefit.

Don’t get me wrong; I am not opposed to development, being a professional civil engineer for 40-plus years, I have worked my entire career in construction. What I am opposed to is irresponsible development.

The Little Bear Creek site is located at the mouth of Little Bear Creek, where it will not provide any flood attenuation, water quality enhancement, wildlife habitat or fisheries benefit upstream. Yet Snohomish County will use its banked mitigation credits for wetland destruction in streams miles away such as Swamp Creek, Big Bear Creek, North Creek or even as far away as the Paine Field airport, falsely claiming mitigation for lost wetlands when no mitigation is actually provided.

The entire wetland mitigation banking process is flawed and was only proposed as a cheap fig-leaf to allow wetland destruction throughout the watershed to promote irresponsible development. The state administrative code mandates that the mitigation bank credits demonstrate that the ecological and hydrological benefits of the bank extend beyond the bank site location.

So how does the county get away with mitigation banking scheme without actually demonstrating ecological and hydrological benefits? Because the county has a building department that will not enforce the law and a hearing examiner who favors development over environmental protection.

In an episode from “The Simpsons,” Montgomery Burns drives a dump truck up to Lake Springfield loaded with barrels of leaking, green-glowing, radioactive waste. The sign at the lake says, “No Dumping, $10,000 Fine.” Mr. Burns then dumps all the drums into the lake, reaches into his vest pocket, pulls out $10,000, and flings the bills into the lake. This is exactly what Snohomish County is doing with the Little Bear Creek mitigation site.

Please let County Executive Dave Somers (County.executive@co.snohomish.wa.us) know that this ecologically worthless mitigation banking scheme should be scrapped, and that any wetland mitigation must be in the same stream basin and in close proximity to the wetlands it is intended to restore.

William Lider is a professional engineer at Lider Engineering. He lives in Lynnwood.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Oct. 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), right, arrives to join Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) at a news conference on Capitol Hill after the House passed a stopgap bill to keep federal funding flowing past a Sept. 30 deadline on Friday, Sept. 19, 2025. The House narrowly passed the bill on Friday, but the measure appears dead on arrival in the Senate, where Democrats have vowed to block it. (Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Democrats point to problem deeper than the shutdown

Two state Democrats say they are holding out to force talks on a looming health care crisis.

Comment: Supreme Court term likely to be a momentous one

After signaling an expansion of Trump’s powers earlier, the court majority could make those official.

Comment: Hegseth gives a masterclass in poor leadership

Focusing on appearance, rather than a changing battlefield, Hegseth fakes it in front of skilled leaders.

Where are the officials who serve constituents?

I was just wondering why while the MAGA type politicians get further… Continue reading

ICE arrests based on race, language are un-American

ICE raids are a common feature of American life. So, what if… Continue reading

Jan. 6 Capitol riot doesn’t count as “political violence”?

Political violence No mention of Jan. 6 Capitol riot? Isn’t it macabre… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Oct. 5

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Signage outside the Capitol Hill visitors center notifies the public of its closure due to the government shutdown in Washington, on Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2025. The first government shutdown in nearly six years left federal agencies in flux and many of their employees in a state of confusion on Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2025, as they received last-minute and conflicting instructions from managers. (Alex Kent/The New York Times)
Comment: How long can this go on and who gets the blame?

Neither side appears willing to budge yet; that may change as more Americans feel the pain.

Roberts: Ignoring scientific fact won’t change climate physics

In favoring cherry-picked pseudo science over peer-reviewed consensus, Trump amplifies the climate crisis.

Everett School Board: Jackson Laurence works for students

We urge you to vote to return Anna Marie Jackson Laurence to… Continue reading

Is this Trump’s coup plan?

So Donald Trump will put armed troops into city after city whose… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.