Forum: We strive for Belonging, then keep it to ourselves

From childhood we treat Belonging as something to be jealously guarded. What if others belong, too?

By Dan Hazen / Herald Forum

I was lying in a meadow at the foot of Mount Christie in the Olympic mountains, a two-day hike to the nearest logging road. I hadn’t seen another humanbeing for three days, yet I had never felt a greater sense of belonging.

Belonging is mysterious and powerful. Present amid profound solitude, it can also be absent in a dense crowd. It is a lived experience that we cannot deny exists, yet we lack tools to measure, dissect or quantify it. We can only point and say, ‘There it is” or “There is the space where it should be.”

Belonging is at the heart of our “culture wars.” Humans in the developed West fear that we are running out of Belonging; that Belonging is a perishable resource like oil or gold. If you’re lucky enough to possess Belonging you better hold onto it, protect it, hide it and defend it. If you have none, it’s expected that you’ll pay for it, extract it, or take it by force. This scarcity myth inevitably leads to war because the myth creates haves and have-nots, privileged and oppressed, powerful and powerless, all of whom are arrayed against one another because they’re convinced Belonging, while highly valuable, is limited.

“Will you be on the right side of history (with Us)?” “Silence (disagreeing with Us) is violence!” “Make America (Us not Them) great again!” “Love it (code for Us) or leave it (join Them).”

Belonging is always at work in the background like your gut biome: it has its place, but in recent decades it has taken over like an aggressive bacterial infection, and it’s making us critically ill. Belonging is a currency openly traded on playgrounds and in middle school hallways because children have always believed The Limited Belonging Myth. If you have the power to grant or withhold Belonging, you essentially define reality (a core definition of leadership) and this is how children construct their sub-cultures and authority structures. Why this childish economy has spread like mold into adult culture and politics is a partial mystery.

I suspect some of it has to do with our unique place in history; for at least three generations, parents have failed to help their children grow out of that playground economy. Some of it has to do with our bloated, over-indulgent appetites: we’re basically bored and so we invent ways of excluding and including, creating drama and manufacturing controversies to entertain ourselves. (This is a hallmark of decaying empires). But some Belonging is natural and good.

How do we separate the real, healthy and necessary Belonging from the fictional, corrupted and life-threatening kind?

First, consider how you would change your behaviors if you knew Belonging was boundless and eternal; that you can never run out of it. How would you live? For example, if electricity were free, non-polluting, and 100 precent renewable, how would your life change?

Second, consider how you would treat others if you knew that they Belonged too, no matter their nationality, class, politics, race, gender or place in a “network.”

Third, live like those two things are true and see what begins to fall away.

Dan Hazen lives in Marysville and works in Everett.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: A recap of Herald Editorial Board endorsements

By The Herald Editorial Board Voters, open up your ballots and voters… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Oct. 27

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Oct. 23

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: White House didn’t need Trump’s Mar-a-Lago makeover

The ‘billionaire’s ballroom’ will stand as a garish monument to one man’s taste for gold-plated everything.

In an official White House photo, President Lyndon Johnson shakes hands with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. after signing the Voting Rights Act of 1965, in Washington on Aug. 6, 1965. The Supreme Court has shown a willingness to chip away at the landmark civil rights legislation. A Louisiana case could unravel much of its remaining power. (Yoichi Okamoto/Lyndon B. Johnson Library via The New York Times) — NO SALES. FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY. —
Comment: Ruling could effectively end landmark voting rights act

If the Supreme Court throws out Section 2 of the act, Republicans could gain up to 19 more seats.

Add name to petition to impeach President Trump

Impeach Trump Add name to petition for action Donald Trump has violated… Continue reading

Can bribe to leave the country be expanded?

Bribes to leave U.S. Can the offer be expanded? Have you seen… Continue reading

Immigration isn’t the problem many believe

Immigration Not the problem many believe The immigration problem is an exaggeration… Continue reading

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Elect Allison, Golebiewski to Mill Creek council

Allison merits a second term for Position 3. Golebiewski should be elected to Position 4’s open seat.

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Low merits third term on Snohomish County Council

Low has successfully represented his constituents as a council member and a state lawmaker.

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Yes on SJR 8201 a prudent investment for WA Cares

Voters should place the long-term care benefit’s fund in the hands of the state investment board.

October 23, 2025: No Kings Protest
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Oct. 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.