Forum: What will future generations think of our monuments?

A 20th century stone cross with an engraved sword seems a contradiction of Jesus’ message. But what of our monuments?

Dan Hazen

Dan Hazen

By Dan Hazen / Herald Forum

I’m writing from a solitary prayer-shack (“poustinia”) in Northumberland, England. My wife and I are in the United Kingdom serving at a Christian community of which we are a part. During a few down days, we visited nearby locations of beauty and interest including Roslyn Chapel, St. Abb’s Head and Edinburgh.

Just outside Edinburgh Castle are various monuments and memorials. One I had not noticed on previous visits caught my eye: The Scottish Horse Memorial Cross. It commemorates causalities in the Scottish Horse Regiment during the Boer Wars in South Africa (ca. 1900).

My first reaction was one of awe and inspiration. In a word … it’s cool. It’s a stone, Celtic-style cross about 14 feet high on a stone plinth. Superimposed on the front, mirroring the geometry of the cross, is a huge sword. It occupies nearly the full length and breadth of the cross.

My second reaction surprised me a little because it so opposed the first one. I was deeply put-off. “Offended” isn’t the right word. I’ve actually tried to get offended over things before, and I just don’t seem to have the gene for it. Disgust maybe. Shame. Embarrassment. As a disciple of Jesus, I flinch at any blending of Christian imagery with non-sequitur images.

Jesus needs a good intellectual properties lawyer, because his brand is used to endorse all kinds of stuff, and I suspect it’s without his permission.

But this one was just so … profane. A sword. Like I said, swords are cool; no denying that. But I imagined this memorial being erected in 2023 and the artist using an AR-15 instead of a sword; the butt of the rifle at the top, the barrel pointing downward and the magazine serving as one side of the horizontal. What would the response from Jesus’ people be?

It begs a question I have asked in this space before: How do you respond when you encounter weakness? Do you see an opportunity to gain advantage (predator) or do you see the opportunity to serve (protector). The Boer Wars are emblematic of the worst of European imperial predation of the technologically weak. The Scottish Horse Memorial literally carves it in stone, and it invokes the brand of the Prince of Peace to do so. But of course, at the time, they were quite sure they were doing the Lord’s work.

In these days after Easter (when Jesus literally said, “put your sword away”) it might be worth contemplating what symbols we want to be remembered by. How do we respond to weakness? What tools of your trade will be superimposed over the symbol of your highest values?

Maybe Donald Trump’s face backed by a huge dollar sign? How about an enormous DNA molecule representing “science” and “best practices” fronted by a judge’s gavel descending on the “uneducated” who “resist progress.” A rainbow flag? An American flag? A Che Guevara flag? A “Don’t Tread on Me” flag? Any flag you like; but all with a big megaphone emblazoned across it?

What will they think when they look at our monuments?

Dan Hazen is the community pastor at Allen Creek Community Church in Marysville.

Herald Forum

The Herald Forum invites community members to submit essays on topics of importance and interest to them. Essays typically are between 400 and 600 words in length, although exceptions for longer pieces can be made. To submit essays or for more information about the Herald Forum, write Herald Opinion editor Jon Bauer at jbauer@heraldnet.com or call him at 425-339-3466.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Nov. 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Story Corps
Editorial: Political debate isn’t on Thanksgiving menu for most

A better option for table talk are family stories. Share them with the Great Thanksgiving Listen.

Welch: State shouldn’t ease sentences for child sex predators

An advisory panel recommends legislation that would reduce sentences for those caught in predator stings.

Goldberg: A quiet march toward regime change in Venezuela

The Trump administration has less of a case for action against Maduro than it had for war in Iraq.

Comment: One word can get Trump back in climate fight: tariff

A global agreement to impose tariffs on countries that don’t reduce emissions could pressure the U.S.’s return.

Comment: The middle class is shrinking, yet we’re better off

A comparison of incomes between decades show gains for most Americans, even if we’re not feeling it.

Comment: Housing inequality is only going to get worse for now

More homes are being built, but market demand is for homes selling for $750,000 and higher.

FILE — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau logo is seen through a window at the CFPB offices in Washington on Sept. 23, 2019. Employees of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau were instructed to cease “all supervision and examination activity” and “all stakeholder engagement,” effectively stopping the agency’s operations, in an email from the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, on Saturday, Feb. 8, 2025. (Ting Shen/The New York Times)
Editorial: Keep medical debt off credit score reporting

The federal CFPB is challenging a state law that bars medical debt from credit bureaus’ consideration.

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Recognizing state history’s conflicts and common ground

State officials seek consensus in siting statues of an Indian rights activist and a missionary.

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Nov. 25

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Two ideas that could encourage housing construction

Give all residents of cities that build housing a rebate and ramp up construction of modular homes.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.