Legislative redisrtricting: Not happy some voters now in 12th LD

I am writing in reference to recent front page article regarding the race for the 39th Legislative District (“Dynamic Duel: Republicans Sutherland and Low square off in primary,” The Herald, July 24). I was interested in knowing more about each candidate and their goals and aspirations for our area and I appreciate the specific issues highlighted in the article, except for one thing: I can’t vote for any other them!

I am angry that the Monroe, Arlington and Sultan communities have now been bumped into the 12th Legislative District with candidates I am totally unfamiliar with. When I looked at my ballot I was shocked to see just three candidates for two positions where two are incumbents from Chelan County! What?! Now we have been added to communities in Chelan, Grant and Okanogan counties, all in Eastern Washington! I know nothing about the candidates other than what’s in the voters’ pamphlet. I don’t know how they have voted in the past or what their political platforms consist of. How can these candidates really represent us? I feel strongly that the community I live in has issues and concerns more similar with the 39th district communities that we live less than 10 miles from.

I also argue that the issues of importance to communities in Eastern Washington counties are totally unlike our surrounding “foothill” communities referenced by Karl de Jong. The economics of our area is totally different than in Eastern Washington! There are multitudes of farmers in eastern Washington counties with farming issues and concerns. I don’t see many wheat farms around here. Our area is an urban area; not a rural community! Despite what the census redistricting dictates, I feel like a part of my voice has been ripped away and that my issues will not be fairly represented in Olympia.

Jane Johnson

Monroe

Talk to us

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, June 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

The WA Cares law is designed to give individuals access to a lifetime benefit amount that, should they need it, they can use on a wide range of long-term services and supports. (Washington State Department of Social and Health Services)
Editorial: What good is that new payroll deduction?

Along with a modest benefit for long-term care needs, it should prompt family discussions and planning.

Comment: Families living with Alzheimer’s can find support

For a job that no one asks for, it’s vital for family caregivers to know where to take their questions.

Comment: More dam studies won’t change what we know

Studying how to replace the carbon-free electricity of the Snake River dams ignores their other benefits.

Comment: Congress needs to fully fund bees’ highway habitat

Providing bees and butterflies with habitat along U.S. highways can assure their pollination work.

Dan Hazen
Forum: When pink slips go out, why can’t the best be kept on?

Union rules about who stays and who goes don’t seem to benefit students, schools or teachers.

Ron Friesen
Forum: We seem locked in cycle where we allow wealth to rule

Twice in America’s history we’ve allowed greed to lead at great cost to society. It’s happening again.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, June 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Phlebotomist Heather Evans preps JaNeen Aagaard a donation at Bloodworks NW Friday afternoon in Everett at July 3o, 2021.  (Kevin Clark / The Herald)
Editorial: Get back in (or start) your habit of giving blood

The pandemic’s effects and fewer younger donors too often leave blood supplies dangerously low.

Most Read