Paul Benz: Three short words — of, by and for — explain democracy

Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address described our government’s basis, authority and who it was meant to serve.

Paul Benz

Paul Benz

By Paul Benz / Herald Forum

Of, by and for; who is government but we, the people.

Remember these three words? That, in essence, defines the word “government” and are a part of the last sentence of the shortest and probably most memorable of all speeches delivered by a president of the United States.

Yes, these three words — of, by and for — are a part of the last sentence of the Gettysburg Address, delivered on Nov. 19th, 1863 on the famous battlefield in southeast Pennslyvania by President Abraham Lincoln. The Civil War, of course, was a very divided time for our country; where family fought against family. Now our country has been, is, and will continue to be as divided as we were then.

What can we do to bridge this huge divide that encompasses so many aspects of life?

Lincoln and these three words may provide some kind of a response to that question. Lincoln was trying to unite a divided nation by taking the nation back to the roots of what it meant to be a nation. He did that in this world-renowned speech in the last sentence of a 275-word address, written on his short train ride to a still bloody battlefield — only four and a half months had elapsed — from our nation’s capital.

His speech summed up what government means: of the people, by the people, and for the people. All three of those phrases are interconnected with each other and can serve as a reminder to all of us who is the government; no matter what we think of the current system and those serving in it. Remember, that in 1863 neither President Lincoln or Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederate States, were polling that great with their respective citizens; in other words they had plenty of dissenters.

“Of the people” refers to who the government is. The government of our nation or state is not in Washington, D.C. or in Oympia, but resides with “we the people.” That is an ideal that we should never forget no matter how alienated or angry we are with government and those in it.

“By the people” means that “we, the people” select or vote on who our elected representatives are. That is why the right to vote and our voting systems are so fundamental to government and who our elected officials are, and the means by which to change who that person is, the electoral process. Indeed, Washington state along with many other states have an initiative and referendum process where “we, the people” can even create and overturn laws. “By the people” is our direct way to engage in determining what our laws will or won’t be and who writes them and votes on them.

“For the people” refers to the purpose of government, which should always be “for the people.” Yes, we know well the historic and huge imperfections of the systems and its many departments within our federal, state and local levels. But we also need to stop and remember the many benefits that government provides for “we, the people”; yes, our tax dollars at work. Even in the midst of the great divisions we have we can still make the changes we want to see from the most local of changes at the city, county, and school district levels to our state Leegislature, to who serves in Congress and the White House.

Government will be what “we, the people” determine it to be. Oh yes, as a 20-year plus lobbyist, I am well aware of the many forces and the high-stakes financing behind so many of our races and elections. However, we cannot and must not succumb to our fears and self interests, which continue to contribute to not bridging our great divides.

As Lincoln said we must always seek the “better angels” within ourselves and within our communities to ensure the government remains “of, by and for the people.”

Paul Benz is a long-time faith leader and is co-director for policy at Faith Action Network, a statewide interfaith social justice advocacy organization. He has lived in south Everett for more than 20 years and in Washington state for 34 years.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A semiautomatic handgun with a safety cable lock that prevents loading ammunition. (Dan Bates / The Herald)
Editorial: Adopt permit-to-purchase gun law to cut deaths

Requiring training and a permit to buy a firearm could reduce deaths, particularly suicides.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, March 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Fire District 4 shouldn’t need funding increase through levy

A recent Herald article led its readers to believe Fire District 4… Continue reading

Trump administration should make decisions with evidence, care

The Trump administration has embarked on a path of mindless cutting and… Continue reading

Comment: Roberts had to chastise Trump for threat to judge

Calling for the impeachment of judges over rulings has a long history, and it’s why the chief justice spoke up.

Comment: Anti-vax culture war on mRNA may end up costing lives

False theories are discouraging research and prompting legislation to block valuable vaccines.

Comment: DOGE’s real goal is to privatize government services

And it will be red states and rural areas that will pay more for commercial service for mail and more.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: One option for pausing pay raise for state electeds

Only a referendum could hold off pay increases for state lawmakers and others facing a budget crisis.

**EMBARGO: No electronic distribution, Web posting or street sales before Saturday at 3:00 a.m. ET on Mar. 1, 2025. No exceptions for any reasons. EMBARGO set by source.** House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, (D-NY) speaks at a news conference about Republicans’ potential budget cuts to Medicaid, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Feb. 27, 2025. As Republicans push a budget resolution through Congress that will almost certainly require Medicaid cuts to finance a huge tax reduction, Democrats see an opening to use the same strategy in 2026 that won them back the House in 2018. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Editorial: Don’t gut Medicaid for richest Americans’ tax cuts

Extending tax cuts, as promised by Republicans, would likely force damaging cuts to Medicaid.

Two workers walk past a train following a press event at the Lynnwood City Center Link Station on Friday, June 7, 2024, in Lynnwood, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Open Sound Transit CEO hiring to public review

One finalist is known; the King County executive. All finalists should make their pitch to the public.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, March 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Welch: Lawmakers ignore needs of families with disabled kids

Two bills would have offered financial assistance to families providing home care. Neither survived.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.