Reshaping politics, ideas

In response to the Sept. 17 letter from Ellie Erickson, “Third party candidates: Don’t throw away your vote”: I would like to know who she is to tell me who to vote for? I am a proud Libertarian who will vote for Libertarian candidates whenever I have the chance to do so and when they truly promote Libertarian ideals. Unlike Ms. Erickson’s Democrats, who promote social engineering, increased taxes, spending and government intrusion into my life (along with carpetbagging), Libertarians believe in a smaller government that advocates personal freedoms and increase personal responsibility.

I, for one, do not believe voting for third parties is “throwing away my vote.” Quite the opposite, I believe that giving up on them and voting for the status quo is throwing away my future and freedom. I do agree with her position on voting for the lesser of two evils. Instead of blindly voting Democrat, as Ms Erickson suggests, I would suggest that anyone disgusted with the two-party system realize that it is not a two-party system. There are several parties to choose from. Simply voting Democrat or Republican causes it to appear as if it is a two-party system. To me, the intelligent voter will make the correct decision and vote as their conscience dictates.

While I will grant that it is unlikely that Harry Browne will win the presidency this year (Mr. Browne is the Libertarian Candidate), the fact that Libertarian ideals are being exposed to the public (and government) will eventually help shape our future. In fact, in the voters pamphlet I just received for Snohomish County, there is at least one Libertarian candidate for just about every office, from local to state.

To Ms. Erickson, and others who feel as she does, please allow me the freedom to express my political desires and vote as I wish. The Libertarian Party is giving the old guard (Democrats and Republicans) a real challenge. It’s only a matter of time.

Snohomish

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Nov. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: From opposite ends of crime, a plea for justice reform

A survivor of crime and an incarceree support a bill to forge better outcomes for both communities.

Comment: Misnamed Fix Our Forest Act would worsen wildfire risk

The U.S. Senate bill doesn’t fund proven strategies and looks to increase harvest in protective forests.

Comment: City governments should stay out of the grocery market

Rather than run its own grocery stores, government should get out of the way of private companies.

Forum: Grading students needs shift from testing to achievement

Standardized tests are alienating students and teachers. Focus education on participation and goals.

Forum: Varied interests for ecology, civil rights can speak together

A recent trip to Portland revealed themes common to concerns for protecting salmon, wildlife and civil rights.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Editorial: Welcome guidance on speeding public records duty

The state attorney general is advancing new rules for compliance with the state’s public records law.

The Buzz: Shutdown? What shutdown? We’ got 20,000 emails to read.

Trump was tired of talking about affordability, until emails from a former friend were released.

Schwab: Democratic Party was caught between caving and caring

Those who ended the shutdown ended the challenge but restored vital benefits, because Democrats care.

A state income tax is fair and can fund our needs

The constant tug-of-war between raising taxes and cutting spending is maddening. The… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.