What a free dinner buys you

A generation ago, “legislative ethics” couldn’t pass the straight-face test. Olympia lobbyists looked as if they fell out of a Thomas Nast cartoon of Boss Tweed and Tammany Hall, roaming the veined-marble committee rooms of the Legislative Building, checkbooks in hand.

Over time, the dynamic changed, including a session fundraising freeze, which tamps down the appearance of self-dealing, along with greater transparency and oversight of political campaigns.

Olympia is clean, relative to the 1970s and 80s. But no amount of regulation ensures lawmakers exercise judgment.

The need for specific safeguards was thrown into relief Tuesday as the Legislative Ethics Board noodled what constitutes “infrequent” when establishing the number of meals a lawmaker can accept from self-interested lobbyists. The number they came up with was 12. In Norse mythology, Odin had 12 sons, but otherwise the figure is arbitrary. It sounds, well, frequent enough.

The action and figuring flow directly from an investigative report last year by KUOW’s Austin Jenkins and The Associated Press, which highlighted the unseemly but perfectly legal pageant of legislators accepting $65,000 in free meals from the state’s top 50 lobbyists in the first four months of 2013.

Free grub and entertainment, every day or every other day, but, purportedly, no quid pro quos. (Note as well: Lawmakers shouldn’t be pocketing per diems if they’re landing supper for free.)

State Sen. Doug Ericksen, R-Ferndale, chair of the Energy, Environment and Telecommunications Committee, was the biggest offender, accepting $2,000 in meals and attending 62 lobby dinners.

Jenkins and the AP took three weeks to piece together a database. The value of tough-to-unearth data is just that: Other than newshounds, who will dedicate weeks to ferreting out information on lawmakers’ acceptance of gratis meals?

A state House bill that that would have required lobbyists to file itemized expenses electronically died in the Senate this year. So the onus fell on the Ethics Board to fine tune what should be instinctual: Elected officials working in the public interest shouldn’t accept free things from people paid to influence their votes. Period.

As Rep. Drew Hansen, D-Bainbridge, a member of the board noted, “You can buy your own burrito with a lobbyist.”

Regarding campaign dinero, U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens wrote, “Money, like water, always finds an outlet.”

The Legislative Ethics Board did the right thing. The key now is attracting people to public life who don’t need to be reminded of the obvious.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A Microsoft data center campus in East Wenatchee on Nov. 3. The rural region is changing fast as electricians from around the country plug the tech industry’s new, giant data centers into its ample power supply. (Jovelle Tamayo / The New York Times)
Editorial: Meeting needs for data centers, fair power rates

Shared energy demand for AI and ratepayers requires an increased pace for clean energy projects.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Jan. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

State must deliver on promises for state ferry system

Washington State Ferries’ crew shortages continue to cancel crucial sailings on Mukilteo-Clinton… Continue reading

State can’t tax income if robots take jobs

A recent Herald Forum commentary was essentially about how, “Everyone knows that… Continue reading

Comment: What Vance doesn’t get about ‘heritage’ or Americans

Ask the Founders or many who fought for the nation, immigrants are in every sense American.

Comment: Why Trump isn’t likely to back democracy in Venezuela

Based on Trump’s stated desire for control of the country’s oil, his best bet is its current autocracy.

Comment: Are we trending toward another devastating Dust Bowl?

It’s not a certainty, but heat and drought are more frequent in the U.S., upping the odds of the disaster’s return.

Tina Ruybal prepares ballots to be moved to the extraction point in the Snohomish County Election Center on Nov. 3, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: A win for vote-by-mail, amid gathering concern

A judge preserved the state’s deadline for mailed ballots, but more challenges to voting are ahead.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: No new taxes, but maybe ‘pay as we go’ on some needs

New taxes won’t resolve the state’s budget woes, but more limited reforms can still make a difference.

Washington state's Congressional Districts adopted in 2021. (Washington State Redistricting Commission)
Editorial: Lawmakers shouldn’t futz with partisan redistricting

A new proposal to allow state lawmakers to gerrymander congressional districts should be rejected.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Jan. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Burke: Work as a young caddy allowed a swing at life skills

Along with learning blackjack, Yiddish and golf’s finer points, it taught the art of observation.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.