Forum: The one thing that AI can’t replicate: our wondrous flaws

Anything that AI produces, such as music, is hollow in its perfection. Flaws breathe life into our work.

By Ron Friesen / Herald Forum

Are you worried about articial intelligence? That it could take over?

Don’t worry. AI has a critical flaw which makes it impossible to replace humans.

What’s that flaw, you ask? It’s its perfection. Crazy? No.

Humans are the most complex creatures imaginable. No two are exactly alike. No two think exactly alike. Then add this complexity: Flaws. We all have them. In fact, flaws make us perfectly human.

One of my grandsons asked me to listen to some music from a video game he likes. He said the music sounded like real instruments were used. So I listened. The incredible sound was from a lavishly instrumented orchestra, which I immediately loved.

But the music wasn’t from a “real” orchestra. It was from a computer and was generated in a similar way that AI generates pictures.

My grandson asked how I could tell. I said, “It was too perfect.” There wasn’t a single flaw. All the notes were perfectly the same, and the ensemble playing was perfect. Human musicians aspire to this level of perfection. And they come close.

When the Seattle Symphony played John Williams’ score with a live showing of the first “Star Wars” movie, it was electrifying! And it was as perfect as those incredible musicians could make it. But it wasn’t “AI perfect,” which made it even better!

Each musician put their sound and soul into every note, which meant there were infinitesimal dierences as the notes were played, just as the brush strokes of an artist are similar, but never identical. It was the lack of rigid identicalness that made the live orchestra’s music spellbinding. There were flaws — uniqueness — as each human played and adapted to each other.

Humans also need other humans to understand our differences to be able to adapt with them. When I call for help and get a robot, it’s always bad news. Especially when I hear, “You’re call is important to us.” I usually call because the web page or app is not designed for my question or needs, or it just is not working. Also, I am old and flawed. Sometimes I do not operate the app or program as perfectly as is required.

I need help from a human.

The great robots and their AI technology cannot and will not adapt to me. I have to adapt to them. AI is “perfect.” I am not. The robot, the app, and AI do not understand this. Only their programmed idea of “perfection” is understood, and I am compelled to adapt. I wonder if this is facism in our technology: It is right; it is the only way; I must conform.

I am increasingly aware of how important our flaws are, because that makes all of us who we are. We care, we love, and we adapt because we love and care. We understand and listen. We can see what needs to be done without being told because we love and we care.

It is this loving and caring with all our flaws which makes our families and communities stronger and better. (And it makes incredible music!) AI and robots can’t do this.

But the darker concern is if humans can be robots.

As we prepare for 2025 and beyond, watch out for corporations, billionaires, and elected ocials who only care about money and power. These are the uncaring “robots” in our culture, economy, and government, and they don’t care about you or me.

They do not see themselves as one of us, but as being over us. Robots.

I want humans who love and care to be in charge. I will resist the “perfection” required by AI generated robots as well as the human ones. I value humans

because of our “perfect imperfections” as John Legend sings in “All of Me Loves All of You.”

Our flaws. Our humanity. Our perfection.

Ron Friesen is a Marysville resident, a retired music teacher and community and church musician and is committed to community improvement.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

FILE — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau logo is seen through a window at the CFPB offices in Washington on Sept. 23, 2019. Employees of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau were instructed to cease “all supervision and examination activity” and “all stakeholder engagement,” effectively stopping the agency’s operations, in an email from the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, on Saturday, Feb. 8, 2025. (Ting Shen/The New York Times)
Editorial: Keep medical debt off credit score reporting

The federal CFPB is challenging a state law that bars medical debt from credit bureaus’ consideration.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Nov. 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump’s $2,000 tariff rebates are a shell game

Most Americans have already paid $1,800 in price increases from the tariffs. It’s another distraction.

Comment: If Trump cares about affordability, he must show it

It will take more than reducing tariffs on a few items; he must show he understands consumers’ pain.

Comment: States pitch property tax relief but less local control

Texas’ and Florida’s governors want to reduce property taxes, but what would that do to public services?

Stephens: U.S. has good reason to overthrow Venezuela’s Maduro

There are risks in a military action, especially a half-hearted one that leaves him in power.

Comment: How women age may be key to longer, healthier lives

Women, long ignored in studies, are revealing new areas of study regarding human longevity.

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Recognizing state history’s conflicts and common ground

State officials seek consensus in siting statues of an Indian rights activist and a missionary.

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

Editorial: Welcome guidance on speeding public records duty

The state attorney general is advancing new rules for compliance with the state’s public records law.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Nov. 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Burke: Borrowing from The Bard on the path before us

Shakespearean lines, from comedy or tragedy, fit the moment when there’s something rotten.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.