Stock buybacks, good or bad? They’re both

There is a scent of market manipulation about the practice that is worrisome.

Are stock buybacks good for investors or just one more way that big money exploits ordinary people? Answer: both.

Stock buybacks can be a way for corporations to share the benefits of excess cash receipts and for a company to “invest in itself.” Alternatively, it can be a way for a corporation to manipulate its stock price and provide a cushy, tax-advantaged bonus to its top executives.

And, like Schrödinger’s cat in the magical world of quantum physics, stock buybacks can be on both good and bad ledgers at the same time.

When a corporation buys back some of its own outstanding shares of stock, that action often prompts a rise in the market price. This is due to three factors: psychology; economics; and investor decision criteria.

The psychology aspect comes not only from the past market behavior, which has been that the stock price rises when the buyback is implemented, and the assumption that the corporation is flush with cash, which is a good position to be in. The buyback is also often believed to reflect management’s confidence in the performance of and prospects for the company.

The economics dimension comes in when the corporation becomes another active buyer in the open market. This tends to give an upward push to the price. In the aggregate this can become a factor in economic policy and our economy’s performance.

Stock buybacks also have an indirect effect on economic policy and economic growth. Stock market prices are a “Leading Economic Indicator” which affect not only economic policy decisions but also the overall level of confidence in the economy and its prospects.

Investors, whether they are individuals, fund managers, or robotic auto-buy/auto-sell programs, make their market decisions based in large part on key corporate indexes such as “EPS,” earnings per share. Stock buybacks have a direct, positive effect on EPS, because they leave corporate earnings unchanged while reducing the number of outstanding shares – the divisor in the earnings per share. Depending on the buyback size, this could be a significant factor in the apparent health of a corporation.

The upward push in earnings per share isn’t the only balance sheet effect of a stock buyback. Return on Assets (ROA) goes up, because cash, an asset, is reduced and corporate earnings remain unchanged.

Until recently, few people outside of Wall Street paid much attention to stock buybacks. There was little reporting of them in the news media, partly because once the subject of accounting-speak like “balance sheet effects” pops up half the audience immediately turns the page in the newspaper or reaches for the TV remote. And hard data on buybacks still isn’t tallied by federal regulators.

That all changed when the huge size of stock buybacks became better known. Last year, for example, corporations in the S&P 500 made stock buybacks totaling $806.4 billion — enough to deserve attention.

The attention hasn’t been all positive. After all, this is a year of political campaigns. Senators Bernie Sanders and Chuck Schumer want to limit or ban stock buybacks and have portrayed American corporations as greedy, self-indulgent and promoting shareholders’ and management’s interests above those of all other stakeholders, including workers.

Goldman Sachs, on the other hand, sees a ban on stock buybacks as an economic disaster and the end of the world as we know it.

They are both right…a little. Corporate management is often self-absorbed but frequently its objectives coincide with those of both shareholders and the public. That remains the beauty and the benefit of free market competition.

Stock buybacks are a payout bonus for top managers that is taxed at a lower rate than if it were paid in cash. The same share price uptick that accompanies buybacks is the icing on the cake. But it is icing that all shareholders enjoy, not just top management. A recent research report found that stock buybacks were the dominant factor in the net return to investors. In short, those whose nest eggs benefitted from the bull market have stock buybacks to thank.

Even though stock buybacks aren’t evil and corporate management is not an agency of Satan, there is a scent of market manipulation about it that is worrisome. Both CEOs and shareholders themselves often seem obsessed with short-term stock prices and that is not healthy for long-run business health and growth. “Increasing shareholder value” can be a blanket excuse for a dead-end business strategy. We need only to look at General Electric’s history to understand how that works.

Congress often works in mysterious ways. But if the issue isn’t politicized beyond recognition the attention being given to stock buybacks could end up being a good thing, especially if it improves the sketchy data that currently surrounds the practice.

Talk to us

More in Herald Business Journal

FILE - A Boeing 737 Max jet prepares to land at Boeing Field following a test flight in Seattle, Sept. 30, 2020. Boeing said Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2023, that it took more than 200 net orders for passenger airplanes in December and finished 2022 with its best year since 2018, which was before two deadly crashes involving its 737 Max jet and a pandemic that choked off demand for new planes. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File)
Boeing inks deal for up to 300 737 Max planes with Ryanair

At Boeing’s list prices, the deal would be worth more than $40 billion if Ryanair exercises all the options.

Logo for news use featuring Snohomish County, Washington. 220118
Four recognized for building a better community

Economic Alliance of Snohomish County hosts annual awards

Logo for news use featuring Snohomish County, Washington. 220118
Business Briefs: Pandemic recovery aid and workforce support program

Snohomish County launches small business COVID recovery program, and is now accepting NOFA grant applications.

Elson S. Floyd Award winner NAACP President Janice Greene. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Janice Greene: An advocate for supplier diversity and BIPOC opportunities

The president of the Snohomish County NAACP since 2008 is the recipient of this year’s Elson S. Floyd Award.

Emerging Leader Rilee Louangphakdy (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Rilee Louangphakdy: A community volunteer since his teens

Volunteering lifted his spirits and connected him with others after the death of a family member.

Emerging Leader Alex McGinty (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Alex Zitnik-McGinty: Find a group you like and volunteer!

Her volunteer activities cover the spectrum. Fitting in “service work is important as we grow.”

Opportunity Lives Here award winner Workforce Snohomish and director, Joy Emory. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Workforce Snohomish receives Opportunity Lives Here Award

Workforce offers a suite of free services to job seekers and businesses in Snohomish County.

Henry M. Jackson award winner Tom Lane. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Tom Lane: An advocate for small and local businesses

The CEO of Dwayne Lane’s Auto Family is a recipient of this year’s Henry M. Jackson Award.

John M. Fluke Sr. award winner Dom Amor. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Dom Amor: Working behind the scenes to improve the region

Dom Amor is the recipient of this year’s John M. Fluke Sr. Award

Dr. David Kirtley at the new Helion headquarters in Everett, Washington on Wednesday, Jan. 19, 2022  (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Everett nuclear fusion energy company nets first customer: Microsoft

The Everett company, on a quest to produce carbon-free electricity, agreed to provide power to the software giant by 2028.

Hunter Mattson, center, is guided by Blake Horton, right, on a virtual welding simulation during a trade fair at the Evergreen State Fairgrounds in Monroe, Washington, on Wednesday, May 3, 2023. High school kids learned about various trades at the event. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
Trade fair gives Snohomish County kids glimpse of college alternatives

Showcasing the trades, the Trade Up event in Monroe drew hundreds of high school students from east Snohomish County.

A Tesla Model Y Long Range is displayed on Feb. 24, 2021, at the Tesla Gallery in Troy, Mich.  Opinion polls show that most Americans would consider an EV if it cost less, if more charging stations existed and if a wider variety of models were available. The models are coming, but they may roll out ahead of consumer tastes. And that could spell problems for the U.S. auto industry, which is sinking billions into the new technology with dozens of new vehicles on the way.  (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
Tesla leases space at Marysville business park

Elon Musk’s electric car company reportedly leased a massive new building at the Cascade Business Park.